For my thesis, I am planning on
working on Adam Smith’s theory of education.
His educational theory sits right at the volatile intersection of his
two major works: The Theory of Moral
Sentiments (1759) and The Wealth of
Nations (1776). Traditionally, these
two texts have been viewed, respectively, as a representation of Smith’s moral
theory on the one hand, and an exposition of his economics on the other. Yet, as I hope to argue, his moral philosophy
and economics, in fact, support, interweave, and even contradict one another,
but do not, as has traditionally been argued, exist wholly independently.
Commentators often emphasize Smith’s
economic theory as the magnum opus of
his career. As a result, his moral
philosophy has conventionally been separated from and subordinated to his
economics. But recent scholarship has
brought the moral philosophical side of his work back into conversation with his
more popularly known economic theory. I
hope to contribute to this effort by developing an interpretation of Smith’s
theory and philosophy of education, and attempt to identify what, if any,
explicit educational policy he prescribed.
In pursuing this project, I plan to focus both on popular as well as
higher education and intend to weave Smith’s own educational experience into my
narrative and analysis.
I have already spent time at the
University of Glasgow (where Smith worked and taught) in their Special
Collections department reading Smith’s papers and correspondence. I have a substantial amount of relevant
primary source material collected already that provides insight into Smith’s
own educational experience as a student, teacher, and tutor. I am hoping that these materials will play a
central role in bridging the gap between his more esoteric and theoretical
published works and his more practical experiences in the world of education
throughout his life.
One of the challenges of this
project will be building a coherent narrative that integrates Smith’s theory
and ideas with his recorded experiences and interactions. I know that I will need to actively focus on
maintaining a balance between these two pools of primary material while, at the
same time, elucidating their relationship and demonstrating their connections. Secondary sources may be quite helpful in
addressing this challenge by providing examples of ways in which scholars have
dealt with these thematic and structural issues in existing works.
In terms of questions that I would
like my thesis to address: I want to know why Smith has so often been unfairly
and simplistically transformed into a doctrinaire and uncritical advocate of
free markets, particularly in contemporary discourse. This question extends beyond just the
practice of ignoring The Theory of Moral
Sentiments when discussing Smith’s economic theory. Many representations of Smith often purge
themselves of the nuance and complexity that garnered The Wealth of Nations critical acclaim in the first place. I hope that my thesis can explore this
phenomenon and provide an answer to why it has become commonplace.
In
terms of sources, all Smith’s published works are available in a published Glasgow
Edition. I have already had a chance to
look at his correspondence in the original.
During Honors College, I am hoping to shift my focus now towards the
secondary literature.
It's great that you've already done a good deal of research, especially with the primary sources! I'm curious - what were the most interesting things that you found in the archives?
ReplyDelete